CO129-610-5 Marriages solemnized in Stanley Camp during the Japanese occupation and subsequent legislation for divorce 14-2-1947 - 27-6-1947 — Page 41

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

doubt as to its efficacy if husband was not domiciled

in Colony at the time.

4.

Reference para. 3 of my telegram No. 807,

glad to know as soon as possible whether you have

any information as to whether husband in case referred

to in para. 2(c) of that telegram was domiciled in

Hong Kong. Case in question is that raised with

me by Maddin and Company.

Edit History

2026-06-18 23:29:38 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
doubt as to its efficacy if husband was not domiciled in Colony at the time. 4. Reference para. 3 of my telegram No. 807, glad to know as soon as possible whether you have any information as to whether husband in case referred to in para. 2(c) of that telegram was domiciled in Hong Kong. Case in question is that raised with me by Maddin and Company.
Baseline (Original)
doubt as to its efficacy if husband was not domiciled in Colony at the time. 4. Reference para. 3 of my telegram No. 807, lad to know as soon as possible whether you have glad (7) any information as to whether husband in case referred to in para. 2 (c) of that telegram was domiciled in Hong Kong Case in question is that raised with me by Maddin and Company.
2026-06-18 23:29:38 · Baseline
View content

doubt as to its efficacy if husband was not domiciled

in Colony at the time.

4.

Reference para. 3 of my telegram No. 807,

lad to know as soon as possible whether you have

glad

(7)

any information as to whether husband in case referred

to in para. 2 (c) of that telegram was domiciled in

Hong Kong Case in question is that raised with

me by Maddin and Company.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.