doubt as to its efficacy if husband was not domiciled
in Colony at the time.
4.
Reference para. 3 of my telegram No. 807,
lad to know as soon as possible whether you have
glad
(7)
any information as to whether husband in case referred
to in para. 2 (c) of that telegram was domiciled in
Hong Kong Case in question is that raised with
me by Maddin and Company.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.